High-Fidelity Numerical Analysis of Supersonic Shock Boundary Layer Interaction in Propulsion

Authors

  • Kaleeswaran P Author
  • S. Yuvaraj Author

Keywords:

Boundary-layer interaction; separation bubble; supersonic inlet; scramjet isolator; RANS; LES; DNS; propulsion systems.

Abstract

The separation bubbles in the shock-wave and boundary-layer interaction (SBLI) region have adverse effects on inlet pressure recovery, bring about unsteady loading, and are a threat to the operability of supersonic propulsion systems. The focus of this survey is on recent numerical studies of separation-bubble prediction, shock-train coupling, sidewall confinement, transition and control in propulsion-related geometries. Although the literature is not presented chronologically by date, it is sorted sequentially by fidelity level, geometry, unsteadiness mechanism, validation path and control-technology approach. The review demonstrates that Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) is still very useful for preliminary design, that hybrid RANS–large-eddy simulation (LES) is currently the most suitable tool available for unsteady engineering applications and that direct numerical simulation (DNS)/LES is still primarily a physics database. The primary difference lies in a field-stable separation-bubble closure that is numerically robust and will readily adjust across Mach number, Reynolds number, wall temperature, or inlet geometry. 

References

[1] D. V. Gaitonde, “Progress in shock wave/boundary layer interactions,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 72, pp. 80–99, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2014.09.002.

[2] W. Huang, H. Wu, Y.-G. Yang, L. Yan, and S.-B. Li, “Recent advances in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction and its control in internal and external flows,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 174, pp. 103–122, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.05.001.

[3] N. Khobragade, S. Unnikrishnan, and R. Kumar, “Flow instabilities and impact of ramp-isolator junction on shock-boundary-layer interactions in a supersonic intake,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 953, Art. no. A30, 2022, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2022.933.

[4] B. Wang, N. D. Sandham, Z. Hu, and W. Liu, “Numerical study of oblique shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction considering sidewall effects,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 767, pp. 526–561, 2015, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2015.58.

[5] D. J. Lusher and N. D. Sandham, “The effect of flow confinement on laminar shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 897, Art. no. A18, 2020, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2020.380.

[6] A. S. Deshpande and J. Poggie, “Large-scale unsteadiness in a compression ramp flow confined by sidewalls,” Physical Review Fluids, vol. 6, Art. no. 024610, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevFluids.6.024610.

[7] X. Liu, L. Chen, Y. Zhang, H. Tan, Y. Liu, and D. Peng, “Spanwise unsteadiness in the sidewall-confined shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 987, Art. no. R6, 2024, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2024.356.

[8] V. Pasquariello, S. Hickel, and N. A. Adams, “Unsteady effects of strong shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction at high Reynolds number,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 823, pp. 617–657, 2017, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2017.308.

[9] M. C. Adler and D. V. Gaitonde, “Dynamic linear response of a shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interaction using constrained perturbations,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 840, pp. 291–341, 2018, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2018.70.

[10] D. J. Lusher, S. P. Jammy, and N. D. Sandham, “Shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions in the automatic source-code generation framework OpenSBLI,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 173, pp. 17–21, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.081.

[11] V. R. Petha Sethuraman, Y. Yang, and J. G. Kim, “Interaction of shock train with cavity shear layer in a scramjet isolator,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 35, no. 3, Art. no. 036111, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0137481.

[12] K. Sabnis and H. Babinsky, “A review of three-dimensional shock wave-boundary-layer interactions,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 143, Art. no. 100953, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2023.100953.

[13] F.-Y. Zuo and A. Memmolo, “Investigation of conical shock wave/boundary layer interaction in axisymmetric internal flow,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 106, Art. no. 106106, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2020.106106.

[14] N. Khobragade and R. Kumar, “Control of shock wave/boundary layer interactions in a supersonic air intake using a modified backward-facing step,” Shock Waves, vol. 32, pp. 467–481, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00193-022-01091-5.

[15] X. Xin, Z. Wang, C. Lv, and J. Chang, “Mechanism of shock-train/boundary-layer interaction in spanwise concave isolator channels,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 199, pp. 232–248, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.057.

[16] H. X. Huang, H. J. Tan, F. B. Li, X. B. Tang, W. Huang, L. Yan, and Z. B. Du, “Control mechanism of micro vortex generator and secondary recirculation jet combination in the shock wave/boundary layer interaction,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 200, pp. 56–76, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.07.025.

[17] Z. B. Du, C. B. Shen, W. Huang, Y. Shen, and H. Wu, “Investigation on the three-dimensional shock wave/turbulence boundary layer control induced by the secondary recirculation jets,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 237, Art. no. 105341, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2022.105341.

[18] X. Y. Zhong, W. Huang, L. Yan, H. Wu, and Z. B. Du, “Investigation on the adaptive control of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction based on the secondary circulation jets,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 198, pp. 233–250, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.06.016.

[19] K. Zhu, F. Xie, G. Wang, Y. C. Hu, Y. G. Yang, M. B. Sun, and W. D. Liu, “Separation characteristics of shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction under the effect of a transverse jet,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 35, no. 5, Art. no. 055142, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0148359.

[20] R. Quadros and M. Bernardini, “Numerical investigation of transitional shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction in supersonic regime,” AIAA Journal, vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 2712–2724, 2018, doi: 10.2514/1.J056650.

[21] N. Mahalingesh, S. Piponniau, and P. Dupont, “A universal scaling for the length scales of shock-induced separation,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 1000, Art. no. A5, 2024, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2024.864.

[22] R. Mangalagiri and S. P. Jammy, “Sidewall effects in laminar ramp induced shockwave boundary layer interactions,” Computers & Fluids, vol. 267, Art. no. 106063, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2023.106063.

[23] S. Priebe, J. H. Tu, C. W. Rowley, and M. P. Martín, “Low-frequency dynamics in a shock-induced separated flow,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 807, pp. 441–477, 2016, doi: 10.1017/jfm.2016.557.

[24] R. H. M. Giepman, R. Louman, F. F. J. Schrijer, and B. W. van Oudheusden, “Experimental study into the effects of forced transition on a shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction,” AIAA Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1313–1325, 2016, doi: 10.2514/1.J054501.

[25] H. X. Huang, H. J. Tan, S. Sun, Y. C. Zhang, and L. Cheng, “Transient interaction between plasma jet and supersonic compression ramp flow,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 30, no. 4, Art. no. 041703, 2018, doi: 10.1063/1.5028493.

[26] W. Li and H. Liu, “Large-eddy simulation of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction control using a backward facing step,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 84, pp. 1011–1019, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.005.

[27] Y. T. Hong, Z. F. Li, and J. M. Yang, “Scaling of interaction lengths for hypersonic shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interactions,” Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 504–509, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.12.028.

[28] C. S. Combs, J. D. Schmisseur, B. F. Bathel, and S. B. Jones, “Unsteady analysis of shock-wave/boundary-layer interaction experiments at Mach 4.2,” AIAA Journal, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 4715–4724, 2019, doi: 10.2514/1.J058073.

[29] K. Zhu, W. D. Liu, and M. B. Sun, “Impacts of periodic disturbances on shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 182, pp. 230–239, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.02.017.

[30] M. C. Adler and D. V. Gaitonde, “Flow similarity in strong swept-shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions,” AIAA Journal, vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 1579–1593, 2019, doi: 10.2514/1.J057534.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-12

Issue

Section

Review article

How to Cite

High-Fidelity Numerical Analysis of Supersonic Shock Boundary Layer Interaction in Propulsion. (2026). Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Informatics, 1(1), 109-120. https://www.journaliei.org/index.php/jiei/article/view/15